Single Sex Public Education Might Be The Solution To The Teen STD Problem

From the NY Times:

“Separating schoolboys from schoolgirls has long been a staple of private and parochial education. But the idea is now gaining traction in American public schools, in response to both the desire of parents to have more choice in their children’s public education and the separate education crises girls and boys have been widely reported to experience.

“Boys are currently behind their sisters in high-school and college graduation rates. School, the boy-crisis argument goes, is shaped by females to match the abilities of girls (or, as Sax puts it, is taught “by soft-spoken women who bore” boys). In 2006, Doug Anglin, a 17-year-old in Milton, Mass., filed a civil rights complaint with the United States Department of Education, claiming that his high school — where there are twice as many girls on the honor roll as there are boys — discriminated against males. His case did not prevail in the courts, but his sentiment found support in the Legislature and the press. That same year, as part of No Child Left Behind, the federal law that authorizes programs aimed at improving accountability and test scores in public schools, the Department of Education passed new regulations making it easier for districts to create single-sex classrooms and schools.

TheStateOf . . . Single Sex Public Education. I (J) would be supportive of single sex education if individual school districts wanted to do so. I went to an all-boys high school. Had I gone with girls, I’d probably never graduated! (smile) Of course the feminists would never allow same sex schools; they’d come up with some statistic that says that girls receive .08 less pencils per year than boys.

Leave a Reply