How Heterosexuality Works - The Old Skool Edition
Posted on May 7, 2008 by thestateofblog
Possessiveness is natural, and a good thing: Men want the simple feeling of “possessing” a woman. In their heart, many women have the complementary desire - to totally “belong” to their husband. Men seek to create offspring that is undoutebly “theirs.” And women seek to provide their men such emotional security.
Filed under: Relationships
J,
I see you provided one that is unequivocally addressed to heterosexual relationships. Since you get on me about such things, I think you dodged Lulu’s question from yesterday.
Why am I thinking about the Maury Show while reading this…
My kids better be 147% mine!
Good stuff on men wanting to possess. I tell my ladies to get themselves to the place where someone gentleman would ‘want’ to ‘possess’ them… good booty and hot meal is only good for a lil while.
Hope no one gets lost in the wordage.
Rich,
I noticed that too
lol
And how, pray tell, does a man “possess” a women?
“what does heterosexuality have to do with love?”
lulu
Everything in the universe is built as a union of opposites. From the largest stars to the smallest atom. The right side of your body is a mirror of the left side of your body. Split an orange seed down the middle and the two sides will match.
Human beings find wholeness by uniting with our opposites. Heterosexual love is the attraction of opposites. Indeed, as heterosexuals we define ourselves in terms of these differences. We cannot have day, without night. We cannot have up without down. We cannot have positive without negative.
We cannot have male without female. You cannot be a man .. without a woman.
Opposites balance. Balance is harmony. Harmony is love.
Two hairy ass men don’t balance. That’s not love. That’s something else.
-
I’m digging the heterosexuality series. How many more can you come up with?
Men seek to create offspring that is undoutebly “theirs.”
When I was preparing for trial a few years ago, the partner I was working with told me a rule that he follows when picking juries - men are property protective and women are people protective.
I’ve pondered that distinction for years and have seen it confirmed many times over. This is exactly what this post describes. Men are protective of their property, which includes their wife and child (but not in a negative sense). Women are protective of people, which includes their husbands and children.
And it all makes sense why female monogamy is so essential to a relationship - in guaranteeing paternity of the children. Because a man is less likely to protect that which he doubts is his.
Dina: And it all makes sense why female monogamy is so essential to a relationship.
Interesting. So male monogamy isn’t important?
I guess I could extrapolate and assume that you have no problem with polygomy as long as it is one male with multiple females?
Let me say this again. Female monogamy is important to guaranteeing paternity of the children.
Anything else you “extrapolate” is a product of your feminist brainwashing. Now run along and snuggle with R2D2. He’s getting cold and lonely. LOL!
Levois,
I have a million of them - they come to me in dreams at night.
Rod,
Don’t be so automatically negative, bro.
Chi,
A man ‘possesses’ a woman not by trying to control her. But be loving her, protecting her, honoring her and leading the household.
Rich,
Be careful, homie. That Gay Lobby is tied into your brain. When people talk of heterosexual love, your first impulse seems to be to react angrily and queery whether the same applies to gays. In response to Lulu’s question, which I overlooked yesteday, heterosexuality has EVERYTHING to do with love. Love is based on yin and yang, opposites attracting.
Nice dodge D. Could you answer my question instead of throwing out insults?
BTW are you going to teach your daughter that expecting her future husband to be faithful is feminist propaganda? LOL
J, how am l being negative?
All l was asking was are men not supposed to be monogomous also?
Here we go.
Male monogamy is, of course, important because it has to do with the security of the home. Female monogamy is important because of paternity.
With regard to polygamy, if consenting adults wish to do that, that’s their business. And, yes, it would be a male with multiple females. A female who has multiple “husbands” is not a wife. The name for that, I believe, is “fag hag”.
Big J,
No fair. You copied DV’s answer.
And there is not a hint of anger in any response of mine on this topic. It’s mere wonder that you cannot let Homosexuals be.
Rich,
Obviously I didn’t read DV’s answer…
Anyway, the posts have been about relationships between men and women. The thought of men and women loving each other angers some people. I haven’t brought up homosexuals at all.